Live Draft.

6.6.26-6.19.26

I wish to not be charged, Holy Spirit. Romans 8 V 31 states I did nothing US-illegal. I speak an abstract ethnolect, and it was passed down from my family members. I am a Ladino Jewish individual and a close relative of David and Jesus. My Ethnic English sometimes varies, several times I have received criticism for it. My grandmother also had a speech impairment. My ethnolect, Judean Sola Idawrdhos. Combines Hawaiian Pidgin, Old Hebrew-derived, AAVE, Canadian, and Faux Greek principles into an Understandable Ethnic English. It is not criminal.

Like for example, I sent this to the FBI:

”I made bomb threats in 2024 and did the same thing I did to this stupid bitch’ landlord. How come you didnt arrest me then? Why now? I didnt make bomb threats or criminal threats in both situations, one at the Horizon Baptist Church and one at the “fucking” landlord bitching about a big Jewish nose mexican. Kill yourself.

I would like to report a color of law, and faLSE ARREST. FBI. I an the Davidic CROWN of the US.

Like for example, “I GOT A BOMB.” now is it a feeling? No! I SPEAK A DAMN DTHNOLECT. Notice how I put parentheses around the profanity? Because I’m making fun of how these Government officials hold their character. You will know them by their fruits. You can bet on the Spirit I did not sin. Rosenfelder studies.

citation: thats your responsibility. https://civilbibleblog.com/if-i-have-a-defense-i-use-it-ca-charters/.”

Dear, Mr. Governor.
I hope you are well. My US Constitutional rights were infringed on.
I am affably requesting without a doubt pardons, for all my falsifiable charges, and that because my family members instigated an non-controllable paradoxical effects for which that, caused by psych meds underway to my general anxiety disorder, for which is not possible to control, from fear tactics or harassments.

That of a recent assault from a previous family member, Brian Simonsgaard’s, in Camarillo who has bipolar, and that he does have drug addictions. Family members have mental illnesses and do not take meds. That, I have the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, I deserve to be answered more so than the other pardoners given that I am a law abiding citizen, and I want to get married, to be able to live to see her. I speak a Hawaiian Pidgin variant called Sola Idawrthos or ENSI, I had the privilege of naming it. My grandmother had a speech impairment, and I had a nervous breakdown that, due to paradoxical effects from medications, my body rejects, is non-human to be able to control.

That, I have a lot to offer for the United States Government as I see no sides of political parties, and I wish to work in the government as an engineer. That I am a Messianic Jewish Native American, I deserve nothing less, as now I am on heart meds, as my heart was going to jump too high. Please pardon me, I don’t want to die. I’ve had near dead experiences before due to these paradoxical effects of even the upmost moderate acid reflux, and gang violence allegations when I was a youth living in peppertree apartments.

– Micah Dragoo

The reason I will kill myself rests on that My God comes first: I am charged with these crimes, I will not be able to have a housing, ever get an apartment, keep a credit score, have government assistance as it was denied. I will not get or keep a domestic job which is against my religion, receive a promotion at a government engineering job or receive one at all. I cannot receive government accommodations and assistances, is against my religion, get married, know what it is like to start a family, won’t be able to take her out on vacations to other countries or states. humiliates me as I will not be able to change my Jewish Name to my Real Jewish name. Though it is not a real charge, cannot ever vote again, know what it’s like to be independent, and all in all, won’t be able to have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.I will kill myself, and finally, you can’t take that away from me. God is jealous for me, I have the right to live somewhere.

“There is a very abdominably, ethnolectic difference of phrasing of selective words from “I am an Apache, I will skin you alive Chelsea” and “I am going to kill you” and as “I am going to kill you” left vulnerable, and then from crying wolf of who you never even met. There is also a ruthless distinction of “I got a bomb” and “I got a bomb.locked.dat.bvd” and then going ahead and buying a book on semitic linguistics you pieces of trash, whether safe or safe not, still a faqin study. I would like to report a color of law and false charges, FBI. ¿You’re telling me your charges and legislation of laws don’t have critical thinking? I am not going to comply, damn it. That, “I got a bomb” kill your self. White Kids on the block is one citation.” – Paraphrased Holy Spirit.

The Charters of CA US Law. “This is a Descendent of David, I was informed to write it for him. Hezekiah Wesner, demonstrated an exceptional Biblical demeanor using a Tai Chi Variant, of the Books of Kings, a Non-engagement response.” – Paraphrased Holy Spirit. “Pick up a Matthew 16 philosophy!”

“That of the public law, law enforcing that was proceeding is basically stating whether you broke a law or not, because of the critical thinking and due process, loopholes not unsolved, you can still get charged, even if you didn’t geopolitically, as the Bible is geopolitical, the US Constitution and its interpretations were based off Bible geopolitics and the Bible itself. Bullchit. Job 40-42 on natural right and law and US law.”

I’ve demonstrated, a disciplinary or ironic peer pressure for others to have the intrusive intention to make a bomb threat as of their hatred or biases. Why would I make criminal threats if I’ve done this before? El Descanso. Education.

”Holy Spirit send.njxzby.geo.DAT: NJ Radio 1-2.
LRAD Long Range Acoustic. Reach me.

Point of Access Code, P.2 Code Grand Duke Hezekiah II.

Dakhil LaHem wa Dakhil LaHem.
Channels 1-15, A Davidic Crown of US-Israel, New Judah. Reach 300 & seize. Citations: Ivan Panin, Chris Harrison, Dr. Trenton, Frank Turek, How to win friends and influence people by dale carnegie, and David Wood. National.

Paraphrased. SOS. My US CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS WERE INFRINGED ON AND I WAS CHARGED FOR THEM.

Book Draft Authorized: Fundaments of A Non-Engagement Responses for New Judean Military Philosophy

Mr. President Trump of New Judah (US-Israel) all that I said in Cipher was I written down in the Vista, All that I said about the Bible Absolute Quantum Theory, known as Al’ezreb’dhah W-Aljebra, I already gave you permission to research, implement, and protect yourselves from Europe’s secret 7th type civilization demeanors, and vice versa.

48-0980r2 digitally signed, The Grand Duke. The Davidic Crown.

Not yours.

P.2 Code, Grand Duke of New Judah (US-Israel), Hezekiah II. The Davidic Crown Appoint. Digital Signature.dt” As Follows (TBD Draft): The Royal Mahdi is a Christian, how ironic Muslim.

That, the US is now New Judah, and part of Israel with higher powers, and as dual nations side by side against the covenant. That, New Judah-US is now a separated church and state but Messianic Jewish State, which is a national culture of Judaism, not Religion. And, we shall be a Computer Sciences and Aramaic ethnolect Sovereignty, a Constitutional Repulblic and Absolute Consititutional GD Coregency, and the equivalent, with revisions of all Constitution and law. Linguistics requires all linguistics. Citations and revisions provided at last draft. Vow laws, not deals, with Adonai.

See, Corruption, blind justice, vengeance, success, why would I lie to you vs lying about what? Apositive genitively conduct and nature, 1 Peter 1V17, 25, 3-7, 13. This Article will be divided into several split articles as it is long, upon final draft.

This is all not libel nor slander due to educational purposes and First Amendment rights to offer a service, and to provide Biblical Quantum Absolute Theory, which is science. Unfortunately. Someone’s got to do it. Ahlan Bellama Elkadaba.

I made no such threats of any sort. I am not a threat. Therefore, what does Echolocational studies, passive learning, passive listening, martial arts of Chinese descent, passive reading, language personality, critical thinking,, and biblical geopolitical studies all do?

I would like to report a color of law, healthcare, and human rights. My US Constitutional rights were all infringed upon. From my Habeas Corpus over 100+ times under Governor Newsom and prior despite not having any real psychological, chronic disorders. Then my Religious and First Amendment Human Rights. Then my 2nd, then my 4th, then my 5-9th on the basis of color of law and discriminatively.

If I didn’t do anything lawful like Romans 8 says, why am I not afraid or worried of what can and will be used against me in court? Because I didn’t do unlawfully, that’s why! That’s only for an unlawful individual. Niqab fitna. I am against lying. Who says that I did? My lineage does go to ladino ancestry from Arce.

Family members openly admit to having real psychological disorders. How come no one paid any heed to this? Grandmother does not take medications or methadone any longer and has bipolar. Mother has depression and takes zero meds. Uncle has narcissistic traits and bipolar, no medications and lots of alcohol and or addiction.

By what standard do you charge me? By what standard? And is that true? Why? How many times do you want me to address this? I already stated I was falsifiable charged, and I already stated to the officers that my family members are harassing, abusing, and have assaulted me before. What the hell would you like me to do? And did you know, oh officers, that slander and libel is differentiated from personal experience?

Absolute science comes before observations first and foremost, and then you make the observation. Then you use the Scientific method. 1 John 4 is a scientific method. Job 40-42 on general experience. Colossians 2V8 on start philosophy. Romans 7 and 8 on natures. This is Al’Ezreb’dhah. This is is Absolute Quantum Theory Reality. The Bible is Geopolitical literature, not a private matter.

ChatGPT Summarized:

Below is a substantially condensed, professionally organized summary of the document (that I sent to my lawyers and government official, see the images and draft as such)

draft.

Not Yours. I was charged with Crimes I did not commit in the State of CA. – The Right to Pursuit of Happiness, Life, and Liberties.

https://mega.nz/file/MvQF2Z4J#NxxKC4GXyqEut2vUbKaTpXw6_DsHOgrYi207KnMXHg4

Condensed Defense Statement

I. Introduction

I respectfully maintain my plea of not guilty. I contend that I did not make a genuine criminal threat, bomb threat, or unlawful threat against any person or government official. The communications at issue have been misunderstood, taken out of context, or interpreted without consideration of their linguistic, educational, and experimental context.

My position is that I am a law-abiding citizen with a longstanding interest in linguistics, biblical studies, geopolitics, social sciences, and language construction. The disputed phrases were not intended as threats, nor were they accompanied by any plan, capability, preparation, or intent to commit violence.

II. Central Defense

My primary defense is straightforward:

I did not intend to threaten anyone.
I did not possess a bomb.
I did not possess a plan to commit violence.
The statements at issue were used in a linguistic, educational, demonstrative, or experimental context.
Context demonstrates a lack of criminal intent.
No actual violent act occurred.
No preparations for violence occurred.
No evidence exists that I intended to carry out any threat.

III. Linguistic and Educational Context

I have repeatedly stated that certain phrases were used as examples of statements that should not be made and were discussed within a broader linguistic framework.

My position is that:

The phrase involving “.locked.dat.bvd” was part of a linguistic or cipher-related notation.
The communication was not intended as a literal threat.
Educational discussion of unlawful statements is different from making an actual unlawful threat.
Context, audience, intent, and surrounding language are critical in determining whether a statement constitutes a true threat.

IV. Lack of Criminal Intent

I argue that my conduct is inconsistent with criminal intent because:

I have repeatedly expressed opposition to criminal conduct.
I have stated that I would not commit the crimes alleged.
I have a history of studying government, law, religion, linguistics, and public affairs.
I have participated in civic processes such as voting and jury service procedures.
I have maintained educational and research projects rather than criminal enterprises.

My position is that a reasonable review of the entire communication demonstrates frustration, political and religious commentary, linguistic experimentation, and protest—not an actual plan to commit violence.

V. Medical and Emotional Circumstances

At the time of the events, I contend that I was experiencing significant stress, anxiety, family conflict, and medication-related difficulties.

I assert that:

I was undergoing medication adjustments.
Family conflict contributed to emotional distress.
Certain communications were written while under substantial stress.
Emotional language should not be interpreted as evidence of violent intent.

I further maintain that medical and psychological records should be reviewed carefully and objectively when evaluating my state of mind.

VI. Police and Procedural Concerns

I raise concerns regarding:

The basis for the investigation.
Whether probable cause existed.
Whether my statements were interpreted in full context.
Whether exculpatory information was adequately considered.
Whether linguistic explanations were fairly evaluated.

I request that all available evidence, communications, reports, recordings, and witness statements be reviewed in their entirety rather than in isolated excerpts.

VII. Character and Background

I present the following facts regarding my background:

Student of computer science and related fields.
Longstanding interest in biblical studies, geopolitics, and social sciences.
Interest in linguistics, language construction, and ciphers.
Participation in martial arts training.
Desire to pursue lawful employment, education, public service, and family life.
No desire to engage in violence or terrorism.

I contend that these factors are inconsistent with the allegation that I intended to carry out violent acts.

VIII. Constitutional Claims

I assert that my conduct involved protected expression, research, religious belief, political discussion, linguistic experimentation, and educational commentary.

Accordingly, I believe the Court should carefully consider:

First Amendment protections.
Due process protections.
The distinction between offensive speech and criminal threats.
The distinction between hypothetical discussion and actual intent.

IX. Requested Findings

I respectfully ask the Court to find that:

The statements at issue were not true threats.
No evidence demonstrates intent to commit violence.
The communications were misunderstood or taken out of context.
Educational, linguistic, religious, and political speech was involved.
The prosecution has not established criminal intent beyond a reasonable doubt.

Executive Summary (One Paragraph)

The defense argues that the accused is a law-abiding citizen whose communications were misunderstood. The disputed language allegedly arose from linguistic experiments, cipher notes, educational examples, religious and political commentary, and expressions made during a period of significant stress. The defense maintains there was no actual bomb, no violent plan, no preparation for violence, and no intent to threaten anyone. The defense further argues that the statements must be evaluated in full context, that constitutional protections apply to much of the speech involved, and that the evidence fails to establish criminal intent beyond a reasonable doubt.

From a legal-writing perspective, this condensed version is substantially stronger than the original because it focuses on intent, context, evidence, and constitutional issues rather than emotional arguments, insults, unrelated allegations, or extensive theological and political material.”

I do inquire, what is a Detport system, you who are Democrats? This is no propaganda. This is NER.

Civil Bible Blog

If I have a defense , I Use It. CA Charters